95 lines
8.2 KiB
JSON
95 lines
8.2 KiB
JSON
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"skill_name": "directory-submissions",
|
||
|
|
"evals": [
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"id": 1,
|
||
|
|
"prompt": "We're launching our AI SaaS in 3 weeks. Help me plan all the directories we should submit to.",
|
||
|
|
"expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should run Phase 0 readiness assessment with the 9 questions before recommending submissions. Should reject submission if any of items 1-7 are 'no' (hard block) and explain why. Should recommend tier mix: Tier 1 flagship launch (~15 — Product Hunt as anchor, BetaList, HN Show HN, Fazier, DevHunt), Tier 2 startup/SaaS (~50), Tier 3 AI directories (~40 — TAAFT, Futurepedia, Toolify), Tier 4 MCP/agent if applicable. Should map the 3-week Product Hunt prep timeline to calendar dates. Should warn against submitting before destination pages exist. Should reference references/directory-list.md and references/positioning-variations.md. Should recommend the 10-in-30 reviews protocol for G2/Capterra. Should set day-30 and day-90 targets from the KPI table.",
|
||
|
|
"assertions": [
|
||
|
|
"Checks for product-marketing.md",
|
||
|
|
"Runs Phase 0 readiness assessment",
|
||
|
|
"Recommends tier mix appropriate to AI SaaS",
|
||
|
|
"Maps 3-week PH timeline to calendar dates",
|
||
|
|
"Names Product Hunt as anchor",
|
||
|
|
"Recommends 10-in-30 reviews protocol",
|
||
|
|
"Sets day-30 and day-90 KPI targets",
|
||
|
|
"References directory-list.md or positioning-variations.md"
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"files": []
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"id": 2,
|
||
|
|
"prompt": "Can I just copy-paste the same description into every directory?",
|
||
|
|
"expected_output": "Should refuse and explain Rule 3: positioning varies by directory type. Should explain AI engines penalize duplicate content — directories cross-referenced by Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity will de-rank repetitive copy. Should explain different framing per surface: startup directories lead with outcome (audience is founders), SaaS directories lead with alternative framing (people search '[competitor] alternative'), AI directories lead with AI-first architecture, agent/MCP directories lead with the agent/MCP angle, B2B review sites lead with ROI + use case. Should recommend preparing distinct variants per tier: tagline under 10 words, 60-char short description, 150-word long description, 5-8 category tags. Should reference references/positioning-variations.md.",
|
||
|
|
"assertions": [
|
||
|
|
"Refuses the request",
|
||
|
|
"Cites Rule 3 (positioning varies by directory type)",
|
||
|
|
"Notes AI engines penalize duplicate content",
|
||
|
|
"Lists different framing per surface type",
|
||
|
|
"Specifies variant lengths (tagline, short, long)",
|
||
|
|
"References positioning-variations.md"
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"files": []
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"id": 3,
|
||
|
|
"prompt": "Should we pay for one of those directory submission services that submits to 200 directories for $99?",
|
||
|
|
"expected_output": "Should say no, citing 'What NOT to Do' rule 1: don't pay for directory submission services. Should explain the whole point is these are free — it's an afternoon of copy-paste. Should warn that mass-submission services typically submit to low-quality spam directories (DR under 10, no traffic, no editorial quality) which dilute the backlink profile and can trigger Google spam detection. Should recommend the alternative: manually submit to Tier 1-4 directories with appropriate positioning variants and tracker. Should reinforce that the value comes from quality directories with editorial standards, not raw volume.",
|
||
|
|
"assertions": [
|
||
|
|
"Refuses the service",
|
||
|
|
"Cites 'don't pay for submission services' rule",
|
||
|
|
"Warns about low-DR spam directories",
|
||
|
|
"Warns about Google spam penalty risk",
|
||
|
|
"Recommends manual submission to quality directories"
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"files": []
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"id": 4,
|
||
|
|
"prompt": "Walk me through how to launch on Product Hunt next month. We've never done it before.",
|
||
|
|
"expected_output": "Should apply the Product Hunt Deep Dive playbook. Should map the 3-week prep timeline: Day -21 to -14 (warm up hunter account, upvote and comment on 3 launches/day), Day -14 (create Upcoming page), Day -10 (optional book a hunter — trade not cash), Day -7 (draft launch-day assets: 1270x760 gallery images, tagline, 260-char description, first comment), Day -3 (email list warm-up), Day -1 (final check). Should explain launch day: launch at 12:01 AM Pacific Time on Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday only, first 2 hours are everything (need 50+ supporters), post the first comment yourself, reply to every comment in under 30 minutes, share to multiple channels. Should warn never ask for upvotes — ask for feedback. Should warn don't DM strangers — community flags this. Should explain post-launch: write a launch recap blog post with numbers + lessons, cross-post to Indie Hackers, only submit to Show HN if there's a technical angle. Should note 80% of failed launches fail from no warm audience or asking for upvotes.",
|
||
|
|
"assertions": [
|
||
|
|
"Maps 3-week timeline with specific day markers",
|
||
|
|
"Notes 12:01 AM Pacific Time launch",
|
||
|
|
"Restricts to Tue/Wed/Thu",
|
||
|
|
"Emphasizes first 2 hours / 50+ supporters",
|
||
|
|
"Warns never ask for upvotes",
|
||
|
|
"Recommends asking for feedback",
|
||
|
|
"Warns against DMing strangers",
|
||
|
|
"Includes post-launch recap and cross-posting"
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"files": []
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"id": 5,
|
||
|
|
"prompt": "We want to list on G2 but we only have 4 customers right now. Worth doing?",
|
||
|
|
"expected_output": "Should explain G2 and Capterra listings are worthless without reviews — 10 reviews is the magic threshold for Grid appearance. Should recommend NOT submitting yet, or claim the listing but plan a review drive in parallel. Should explain the 10-in-30 protocol: identify 20 users who completed a meaningful action, send each a personal email with direct review URL (reduces friction ~70%), offer a modest thank-you ($25 Amazon gift card is allowed by G2/TrustRadius), follow up once after 5 days, target 50% conversion. Should note the Users Love Us badge is free (20 reviews at 4.0+) but Grid/Momentum/Index/Award badges require a paid G2 plan ($2,999+/year as of Summer 2025) — and recommend NOT spending on paid G2 in year one. Should mention G2 Summer report cutoff ~April 28 and Fall ~July 28. Should suggest waiting until ~10 users are realistic before submitting.",
|
||
|
|
"assertions": [
|
||
|
|
"Explains 10-review threshold for Grid",
|
||
|
|
"Recommends NOT submitting yet OR claim + plan review drive",
|
||
|
|
"Lays out 10-in-30 protocol",
|
||
|
|
"Notes incentive ($25 gift card) is allowed",
|
||
|
|
"Mentions Users Love Us badge requirements",
|
||
|
|
"Warns against paying for G2 plan in year one",
|
||
|
|
"Mentions Summer/Fall report cutoffs"
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"files": []
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"id": 6,
|
||
|
|
"prompt": "We submitted to 50 directories last week. Now what?",
|
||
|
|
"expected_output": "Should warn against treating submissions as the strategy. Should reference 'What NOT to Do' rule 11: don't over-index on launch spike. Flywheel is templates + alternatives + reviews + ongoing content. Should recommend verifying the dofollow status of acquired backlinks (curl -sIL | grep -i rel=). Should pivot to ongoing distribution: destination pages strategy (alternative pages converting 5-15%, use-case/ICP pages, template gallery if applicable, 'best of' listicles you write yourself, integration pages), GEO tactics for AI citation (single H1, FAQ schema, comparison tables, get cited on Reddit/HN, claim Crunchbase/LinkedIn/Wikidata), community presence (Reddit 90/10 rule, LinkedIn 3-5 posts/week, Twitter build-in-public, Indie Hackers, Dev.to/Hashnode). Should remind to track weekly KPIs (DR, referring domains, indexed pages, organic clicks, signups from directory referrals) and investigate if numbers aren't moving rather than submitting more.",
|
||
|
|
"assertions": [
|
||
|
|
"Warns against over-indexing on launch spike",
|
||
|
|
"Recommends verifying dofollow status of backlinks",
|
||
|
|
"Pivots to destination pages strategy",
|
||
|
|
"Mentions GEO tactics",
|
||
|
|
"Includes ongoing community distribution",
|
||
|
|
"Recommends tracking weekly KPIs",
|
||
|
|
"Says investigate before submitting more"
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"files": []
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
}
|