From 314230b6dbfaabfe8854c685cc09e26832b59c62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Corey Haines <34802794+coreyhaines31@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 16:38:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fix: address review feedback on expert panel scoring - Add bridge sentence connecting to Seven Sweeps workflow - Fix scoring criteria conflict: all personas 7+ with 8+ average - Aligns step 5 target with the scoring rubric Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 --- skills/copy-editing/SKILL.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/skills/copy-editing/SKILL.md b/skills/copy-editing/SKILL.md index f439687..eae50b6 100644 --- a/skills/copy-editing/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/copy-editing/SKILL.md @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ For every statement, ask "Okay, so what?" If the copy doesn't answer that questi ## Expert Panel Scoring -For high-stakes copy (landing pages, launch emails, sales pages), use a multi-persona expert review to catch issues that a single perspective misses. +Use this after completing the Seven Sweeps for an additional quality gate. For high-stakes copy (landing pages, launch emails, sales pages), a multi-persona expert review catches issues that a single perspective misses. ### How It Works @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ For high-stakes copy (landing pages, launch emails, sales pages), use a multi-pe 2. **Each persona scores the copy 1-10** on their area of expertise 3. **Collect specific critiques** — not just scores, but what to fix 4. **Revise based on feedback** — address the lowest-scoring areas first -5. **Re-score after revisions** — iterate until all scores hit 8+ +5. **Re-score after revisions** — iterate until all personas score 7+, with an average of 8+ across the panel ### Recommended Expert Panels