Files
marketingskills/skills/competitors/evals/evals.json
T
Corey Haines 30f9b9a729 feat: v2.0 skill renames and CRO consolidation (#291)
* feat: v2.0 skill renames and CRO consolidation

BREAKING CHANGE: Users must reinstall skills after this update.

## Skill Renames (16)
- ab-test-setup → ab-testing
- analytics-tracking → analytics
- aso-audit → aso
- competitor-alternatives → competitors
- email-sequence → emails
- free-tool-strategy → free-tools
- launch-strategy → launch
- onboarding-cro → onboarding
- paywall-upgrade-cro → paywalls
- popup-cro → popups
- pricing-strategy → pricing
- product-marketing-context → product-marketing
- referral-program → referrals
- schema-markup → schema
- signup-flow-cro → signup
- social-content → social

## Consolidations (1)
- page-cro + form-cro → cro (form content in references/form.md)

## Why 2.0?
- Shorter, cleaner skill names
- Consistent naming (no -strategy, -setup, -cro suffixes)
- All cross-references updated across 100+ files

Total skills: 40

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(v2.0): update evals for renamed skills, fix validate script, clear warnings

- Update 32 evals.json files to reference new skill names (page-cro → cro,
  product-marketing-context → product-marketing, etc.) — these were missed
  in the initial v2.0 rename pass since only SKILL.md and marketplace.json
  were updated.
- Fix validate-skills.sh: replace GNU-only `head -n -1` with portable awk
  so frontmatter extraction works on macOS.
- Move Copy Editing Checklist (56 lines) to references/checklist.md to
  bring copy-editing SKILL.md under the 500-line limit (508 → 457).
- Add "see X" pointers to marketing-psychology description for skill
  discovery (cro, pricing, copywriting).
- Update skill-request.yml issue template placeholder (page-cro → cro).

All 40 skills now pass validation with zero warnings.

* fix(v2.0): add evals for 8 missing skills, strip stale frontmatter from cro/form.md

Adds 48 new eval cases (6 per skill) for skills that previously had no evals:
aso, co-marketing, community-marketing, competitor-profiling, directory-submissions,
image, lead-magnets, video. All 40 skills now have eval coverage (251 total cases).

Strips leftover frontmatter from skills/cro/references/form.md — it was inherited
from the old form-cro SKILL.md before consolidation. Reference files don't need
frontmatter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(v2.0): rename paid-ads → ads

One more v2.0 simplification — drops the redundant 'paid-' qualifier. Updates
the skill directory, SKILL.md frontmatter, evals.json, README skill table, the
v2.0 rename table in VERSIONS.md (now 17 renames), and all cross-references in
related skills (ad-creative, aso, competitor-profiling, customer-research,
lead-magnets, marketing-ideas) plus the tools/integrations guides.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(v2.0): bump SKILL.md frontmatter version to 2.0.0 for all 40 skills

VERSIONS.md was already updated to 2.0.0 but the metadata.version field inside
each SKILL.md was still on 1.x. That mismatch would have caused the update-check
flow to perpetually report 'update available' since it compares VERSIONS.md
against local SKILL.md metadata versions.

Caught by codex review (P1).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(v2.0): add legacy product-marketing-context.md filename fallback

Before this fix, users upgrading from v1.x who had a `product-marketing-context.md`
file would lose automatic context loading — every skill only checked the new
`product-marketing.md` filename. Now all 40 skills also accept the legacy
filename (in either `.agents/` or `.claude/`), and the README migration command
covers both legacy and current filenames.

Caught by codex review (P1 + P2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(v2.0): re-sort README skills table alphabetically, fix ads box width

The skills table had a few entries out of alphabetical order from the renames
(co-marketing was after cold-email, ads was at the renamed position).
Re-sorted alphabetically per sync-skills.js. Also padded the 'ads' cell in the
ASCII flow diagram to keep the box width consistent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(v2.0): document folder cleanup on upgrade, stop sync-skills from re-adding skills array

README upgrade guide now includes:
- A clear cleanup step for stale v1.x skill folders (renamed + consolidated) so
  users don't end up with both old and new folders side-by-side after upgrading
- The full v1 to v2 rename map for reference
- Existing product-marketing-context.md migration steps (preserved)

sync-skills.js no longer (re-)introduces a `skills` array on marketplace.json --
Claude Code's plugin schema discovers skills via the `skills/` directory, and the
explicit array was failing validation. The script now refreshes the description
count and strips the stale array if present.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-13 22:05:15 -07:00

94 lines
6.5 KiB
JSON

{
"skill_name": "competitors",
"evals": [
{
"id": 1,
"prompt": "Create a 'Best Asana Alternatives' page for our project management tool. We compete mainly on price (we're $8/user vs their $24/user) and simplicity (they've become bloated). Target audience is small teams (5-20 people).",
"expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should identify this as the plural alternatives format ([Competitor] Alternatives). Should include the essential sections: TL;DR comparison, brief paragraphs on each alternative (including the user's product positioned first or prominently), feature comparison table, pricing comparison, who each alternative is best for. Should use the modular content architecture approach. Should address SEO considerations for the target keyword 'Asana alternatives.' Should position the user's product with the stated differentiators (price, simplicity).",
"assertions": [
"Checks for product-marketing.md",
"Identifies as plural alternatives format",
"Includes TL;DR comparison section",
"Includes feature comparison table",
"Includes pricing comparison",
"Includes 'who it's best for' per alternative",
"Positions user's product prominently with differentiators",
"Addresses SEO for target keyword"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 2,
"prompt": "Write a 'HubSpot vs Salesforce' comparison page. We're HubSpot and want to show why we're the better choice for SMBs.",
"expected_output": "Should identify this as the 'you vs competitor' format. Should include structured comparison sections: overview of both, feature-by-feature comparison, pricing comparison, pros/cons of each, who each is best for, and migration path. Should be factually accurate about the competitor while strategically positioning the user's product. Should include a TL;DR at the top. Should address the SMB angle throughout. Should use the centralized competitor data architecture pattern.",
"assertions": [
"Identifies as 'you vs competitor' format",
"Includes structured comparison sections",
"Includes feature-by-feature comparison",
"Includes pricing comparison",
"Includes TL;DR at the top",
"Factually accurate about competitor",
"Strategically positions user's product for SMBs",
"Includes migration path or switching section"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 3,
"prompt": "we need a page targeting 'mailchimp alternative' (singular). we're an email marketing platform focused on e-commerce brands.",
"expected_output": "Should trigger on casual phrasing. Should identify this as the singular alternative format ([Competitor] Alternative — positioning your product as THE alternative). Should focus the entire page on why the user's product is the best Mailchimp alternative for e-commerce. Should include: why people switch from Mailchimp, what the user's product does better (e-commerce specific features), feature comparison, pricing comparison, migration guide, customer testimonials. Should optimize for the singular keyword 'Mailchimp alternative.'",
"assertions": [
"Triggers on casual phrasing",
"Identifies as singular alternative format",
"Focuses on user's product as THE alternative",
"Includes why people switch from Mailchimp",
"Highlights e-commerce-specific advantages",
"Includes feature and pricing comparison",
"Includes migration guide",
"Optimizes for singular keyword"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 4,
"prompt": "Can you create a comparison page for 'Notion vs Coda'? We're a third-party review site, not affiliated with either product.",
"expected_output": "Should identify this as the 'competitor vs competitor' format (third-party perspective). Should maintain objectivity since the user isn't either product. Should include balanced comparison: overview of both, feature comparison, pricing, pros/cons, use case recommendations. Should use the essential page sections from the skill. Should suggest how to monetize the page (affiliate links, CTA to the user's own product if relevant). Should address SEO for the 'Notion vs Coda' keyword.",
"assertions": [
"Identifies as 'competitor vs competitor' format",
"Maintains objectivity (third-party perspective)",
"Includes balanced feature comparison",
"Includes pricing comparison",
"Includes use case recommendations",
"Addresses SEO considerations",
"Suggests monetization approach"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 5,
"prompt": "We want to build a whole competitor comparison hub. We have 5 main competitors and want to create alternative pages for each, plus head-to-head comparisons. How should we structure this?",
"expected_output": "Should apply the centralized competitor data architecture. Should recommend a hub structure with: individual alternative pages for each competitor (5 singular pages), a 'best alternatives' roundup page, head-to-head comparison pages for key matchups. Should address internal linking strategy between these pages. Should recommend the research process for gathering competitive data. Should address URL structure and site architecture for the hub.",
"assertions": [
"Applies centralized competitor data architecture",
"Recommends hub structure with multiple page types",
"Suggests individual and roundup alternative pages",
"Addresses internal linking between comparison pages",
"Recommends research process for competitive data",
"Addresses URL structure"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 6,
"prompt": "I need to create a battle card for our sales team comparing us to Zendesk. It should help reps handle competitive objections during sales calls.",
"expected_output": "Should recognize this as internal sales enablement material, not a public comparison page. Should defer to or cross-reference the sales-enablement skill, which handles battle cards, objection handling docs, and internal competitive collateral. May provide some competitive positioning advice but should make clear that sales-enablement is the right skill for internal sales materials.",
"assertions": [
"Recognizes this as internal sales enablement material",
"References or defers to sales-enablement skill",
"Does not attempt to create internal battle card using public comparison page patterns"
],
"files": []
}
]
}