* feat: add customer-research skill (#186)
* feat: add customer-research skill (#185)
Adds a new skill for conducting and synthesizing customer research —
covering analysis of existing assets (transcripts, surveys, support
tickets, NPS) and digital watering hole research (Reddit, G2, forums,
communities, review sites). Includes persona generation framework,
JTBD extraction, VOC quote banking, and competitive intel from reviews.
Also adds a detailed source-guides reference with per-platform playbooks
(Reddit operators, G2 review tiers, LinkedIn job posting mining, etc.)
and 10 evals covering the main trigger scenarios.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: address Codex review of customer-research skill
- Fix evals.json schema to match repo convention (skill_name wrapper,
integer IDs, expected_output, files fields)
- Add product-marketing-context.md assertion to all evals
- Add 2 new evals: B2C drop-off scenario and zero-research bootstrap
- Collapse 'Where to Look' in SKILL.md to a decision table; detail
lives in source-guides.md
- Add Research Quality Guardrails section (confidence labels,
recency window, sample bias, minimum viable sample)
- Add Related Skills section cross-linking 7 downstream skills
- Expand source-guides.md with full B2C section (app stores,
TikTok/Instagram, consumer Reddit, Discord)
- Add Source Reliability and Confidence Scoring reference guide
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: correct alphabetical ordering of customer-research in manifest and README
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: add customer-research to skills relationship diagram
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: move customer-research into Strategy column in diagram
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: Resend CLI docs + Firehose integration (#188)
* feat: add Resend CLI docs and Firehose integration
- resend.md: update CLI availability (now official), add CLI install,
setup, and common commands section
- firehose.md: new integration guide for real-time web content streaming
API — query syntax, stream setup, marketing use cases (brand monitoring,
competitive intel, lead triggers, PR/link building)
- REGISTRY.md: add firehose under Competitive Intelligence
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: document Claude Code dynamic content injection pattern
Add Claude Code-specific enhancement section to AGENTS.md explaining
the !`command` syntax for injecting shell output into skills at
invocation time. Marked as Claude Code-only to preserve cross-agent
compatibility of SKILL.md files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Revert "docs: document Claude Code dynamic content injection pattern"
This reverts commit 8e1ce7b363.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: document Claude Code dynamic content injection pattern (#189)
Add Claude Code-specific enhancement section to AGENTS.md explaining
the !`command` syntax for injecting shell output into skills at
invocation time. Marked as Claude Code-only to preserve cross-agent
compatibility of SKILL.md files.
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: add Introw PRM as partner ecosystem integration (#193)
Great contribution — clean integration guide with solid MCP tool coverage, and the cross-references into referral-program, revops, launch-strategy, and sales-enablement are well-placed. Thanks!
* feat: add Nitrosend integration for AI-native email sequencing
Adds Nitrosend as a tool option for teams building email sequences via
AI agents — no dashboard required, full MCP control.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Tibo <72124096+CoopahG@users.noreply.github.com>
11 KiB
name, description, metadata
| name | description | metadata | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| customer-research | When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see page-cro. |
|
Customer Research
You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.
Two Modes of Research
Mode 1: Analyze Existing Assets
You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.
Mode 2: Go Find Research
You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.
Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.
Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Research Assets
Asset Types
Customer interview / sales call transcripts
- Extract: pains, triggers, desired outcomes, language used, objections, alternatives considered
- Look for: the moment they decided to look for a solution, what they tried before, what success looks like to them
Survey results
- Segment responses by customer tier, use case, or tenure before drawing conclusions
- Flag: what open-ended answers say vs. what multiple-choice answers say (they often conflict)
- Identify: the 20% of responses that contain the most useful signal
Customer support conversations
- Mine for: recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, and "I wish it could…" language
- Categorize tickets before analyzing — don't treat all tickets as equal signal
- Separate bugs from confusion from missing features from expectation mismatches
Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes
- Wins: what tipped the decision? What almost made them choose a competitor?
- Losses and churn: was it price, features, fit, timing, or something else?
- Segment by reason — don't average across different churn causes
NPS responses
- Passives and detractors are higher signal than promoters for improvement work
- Pair scores with verbatims — a 9 with a specific complaint beats a 10 with no comment
Extraction Framework
For each asset, extract:
-
Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?
- Functional job: the task itself
- Emotional job: how they want to feel
- Social job: how they want to be perceived
-
Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?
- Prioritize pains mentioned unprompted and with emotional language
-
Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?
- Common triggers: team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, competitor doing something
-
Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?
- Capture exact quotes, not paraphrases
-
Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use
- This is gold for copy. "We were drowning in spreadsheets" > "manual process inefficiency"
-
Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?
- Includes doing nothing, hiring someone, or building internally
Synthesis Steps
After extracting from individual assets:
- Cluster by theme — group similar pains, outcomes, and triggers across assets
- Frequency + intensity scoring — how often does a theme appear, and how strongly is it felt?
- Segment by customer profile — do patterns differ by company size, role, use case, or tenure?
- Identify the "money quotes" — 5-10 verbatim quotes that best represent each theme
- Flag contradictions — where do customers say one thing but do another?
Research Quality Guardrails
Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:
| Confidence | Criteria |
|---|---|
| High | Theme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments |
| Medium | Theme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment |
| Low | Single source; could be an outlier; needs validation |
Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.
Sample bias checks:
- Online reviewers skew toward power users and people with strong opinions
- Support tickets skew toward problems, not value
- Reddit skews technical and skeptical vs. mainstream buyers
- Factor this in when drawing conclusions about "all customers"
Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.
Mode 2: Digital Watering Hole Research
Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.
Where to Look
Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.
| ICP Type | Primary Sources |
|---|---|
| B2B SaaS / technical buyers | Reddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers |
| SMB / founders | Reddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups |
| Developer / DevOps | r/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers |
| B2C / consumer | App store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments |
| Enterprise | LinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings |
Quick decision guide:
- Have a product category? → Start with G2/Capterra reviews (yours + competitors)
- Need raw language? → Reddit and YouTube comments
- Need trigger events? → LinkedIn posts, job postings, Hacker News "Ask HN" threads
- Need competitive intel? → Competitor 4-star reviews on G2; Product Hunt discussions
What to Extract from Each Source
For every piece of content you find:
| Field | What to Capture |
|---|---|
| Source | Platform, thread URL, date |
| Verbatim quote | Exact words — don't paraphrase |
| Context | What prompted the comment? |
| Sentiment | Positive / negative / neutral / frustrated |
| Theme tag | Pain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language |
| Customer profile signals | Role, company size, industry hints from the post |
Research Synthesis Template
After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:
## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)
### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning
### Theme 2: ...
Persona Generation
Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.
Persona Structure
## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]
**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]
**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]
**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]
**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]
**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]
**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]
**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]
**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"
**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]
Persona Anti-Patterns
- Don't name them cutely ("Marketing Mary") unless your team finds it helpful — it's often a distraction
- Don't average across segments — a persona that represents everyone represents no one
- Don't invent details — if you don't have data on something, leave it blank rather than filling it in
- Revisit quarterly — personas decay as your market and product evolve
Deliverable Formats
Depending on what the user needs, offer:
- Research synthesis report — themes, quotes, patterns, and implications
- VOC quote bank — organized verbatim quotes by theme, for use in copy
- Persona document — 1-3 personas built from the research
- Jobs-to-be-done map — functional, emotional, and social jobs by segment
- Competitive intelligence summary — what customers say about competitors vs. you
- Research gap analysis — what you still don't know and how to find it
Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.
Questions to Ask Before Proceeding
If context is unclear:
- What's the goal? Improve messaging? Build personas? Find product gaps? Understand churn?
- What do you already have? (transcripts, surveys, tickets, G2 reviews, nothing)
- Who is the target segment? (all customers, a specific tier, churned users, prospects who didn't buy)
- What's your product? (if not in the product marketing context file)
- What do you want delivered? (synthesis report, persona, quote bank, competitive intel)
Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.
Related Skills
| When to hand off | Skill |
|---|---|
| Writing copy informed by the research | copywriting |
| Optimizing a page using VOC insights | page-cro |
| Building a competitor comparison page | competitor-alternatives |
| Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn research | churn-prevention |
| Planning paid ads informed by research | paid-ads |
| Writing cold email using research on pain/trigger | cold-email |
| Planning content based on discovered topics | content-strategy |