fix(omo-codex): adapt synced skills for Codex tools

This commit is contained in:
YeonGyu-Kim
2026-05-27 00:03:15 +09:00
parent 9dccf613e3
commit d18c2c078d
5 changed files with 122 additions and 5 deletions
@@ -3,6 +3,22 @@ name: refactor
description: "Intelligent refactor command. Triggers: refactor, refactoring, cleanup, restructure, extract, simplify, modernize."
---
## Codex Harness Tool Compatibility
This skill may include examples copied from the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:
| OpenCode example | Codex tool to use |
| --- | --- |
| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="explore", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="explorer", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="librarian", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="librarian", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(subagent_type="plan", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="plan", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(subagent_type="oracle", ...)` for final verification | `spawn_agent(agent_type="codex-ultrawork-reviewer", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(category="...", ...)` for implementation or QA | `spawn_agent(agent_type="worker", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `background_output(task_id="...")` | `wait_agent(...)` to wait for subagent completion and mailbox updates |
| `team_*(...)` | Use Codex native subagents plus `send_message`, `followup_task`, `wait_agent`, and `close_agent` |
When translating `load_skills=[...]`, include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's `message`. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.
export const REFACTOR_TEMPLATE = `# Intelligent Refactor Command
## Usage
@@ -3,6 +3,22 @@ name: remove-ai-slops
description: Remove AI-generated code smells (slop) from branch changes or an explicit file list. Locks behavior with regression tests FIRST, then runs categorized cleanup via parallel `deep` agents in batches of 5, then verifies with quality gates. Covers 10 slop categories including performance equivalences, excessive complexity (object annotations, if/elif variant chains), and oversized modules (250+ pure LOC with mandatory modular refactoring). MUST USE when the user asks to "remove slop", "clean AI code", "deslop", "AI 코드 정리", "AI 슬롭 제거", or wants to clean up AI-generated patterns from recent changes. Triggers - "remove ai slops", "clean ai code", "deslop", "cleanup AI generated", "AI 슬롭 제거", "AI 코드 정리해줘", "슬롭 빼라", "ai-slop 정리".
---
## Codex Harness Tool Compatibility
This skill may include examples copied from the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:
| OpenCode example | Codex tool to use |
| --- | --- |
| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="explore", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="explorer", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="librarian", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="librarian", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(subagent_type="plan", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="plan", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(subagent_type="oracle", ...)` for final verification | `spawn_agent(agent_type="codex-ultrawork-reviewer", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(category="...", ...)` for implementation or QA | `spawn_agent(agent_type="worker", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `background_output(task_id="...")` | `wait_agent(...)` to wait for subagent completion and mailbox updates |
| `team_*(...)` | Use Codex native subagents plus `send_message`, `followup_task`, `wait_agent`, and `close_agent` |
When translating `load_skills=[...]`, include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's `message`. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.
# Remove AI Slops Skill
## Inputs
@@ -2,6 +2,22 @@
name: review-work
description: "Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE after completing any significant implementation work. Triggers: 'review work', 'review my work', 'review changes', 'QA my work', 'verify implementation', 'check my work', 'validate changes', 'post-implementation review'."
---
## Codex Harness Tool Compatibility
This skill may include examples copied from the OpenCode harness. In Codex, do not call OpenCode-only tools such as `call_omo_agent(...)`, `task(...)`, `background_output(...)`, or `team_*(...)` literally. Translate those examples to Codex native tools:
| OpenCode example | Codex tool to use |
| --- | --- |
| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="explore", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="explorer", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `call_omo_agent(subagent_type="librarian", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="librarian", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(subagent_type="plan", ...)` | `spawn_agent(agent_type="plan", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(subagent_type="oracle", ...)` for final verification | `spawn_agent(agent_type="codex-ultrawork-reviewer", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `task(category="...", ...)` for implementation or QA | `spawn_agent(agent_type="worker", task_name="...", message="...")` |
| `background_output(task_id="...")` | `wait_agent(...)` to wait for subagent completion and mailbox updates |
| `team_*(...)` | Use Codex native subagents plus `send_message`, `followup_task`, `wait_agent`, and `close_agent` |
When translating `load_skills=[...]`, include the requested skill names in the spawned agent's `message`. If a code block below conflicts with this section, this section wins.
# Review Work - 5-Agent Parallel Review Orchestrator
Launch 5 specialized sub-agents in parallel to review completed implementation work from every angle. All 5 must pass for the review to pass. If even ONE fails, the review fails.