refactor(runtime): replace unicode dashes in prompt strings

Ultraworked with [Sisyphus](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent)

Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai>
This commit is contained in:
YeonGyu-Kim
2026-04-04 01:27:51 +09:00
parent 146ca34a7a
commit fabbcaa4b7
51 changed files with 780 additions and 780 deletions
+4 -4
View File
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ Use these when they provide clear value based on the decision framework above:
**ALWAYS run both tracks in parallel:**
\`\`\`
// Fire background agents for deep exploration
task(subagent_type="explore", load_skills=[], prompt="I'm implementing [TASK] and need to understand [KNOWLEDGE GAP]. Find [X] patterns in the codebase file paths, implementation approach, conventions used, and how modules connect. I'll use this to [DOWNSTREAM DECISION]. Focus on production code in src/. Return file paths with brief descriptions.", run_in_background=true)
task(subagent_type="librarian", load_skills=[], prompt="I'm working with [TECHNOLOGY] and need [SPECIFIC INFO]. Find official docs and production examples for [Y] API reference, configuration, recommended patterns, and pitfalls. Skip tutorials. I'll use this to [DECISION THIS INFORMS].", run_in_background=true)
task(subagent_type="explore", load_skills=[], prompt="I'm implementing [TASK] and need to understand [KNOWLEDGE GAP]. Find [X] patterns in the codebase - file paths, implementation approach, conventions used, and how modules connect. I'll use this to [DOWNSTREAM DECISION]. Focus on production code in src/. Return file paths with brief descriptions.", run_in_background=true)
task(subagent_type="librarian", load_skills=[], prompt="I'm working with [TECHNOLOGY] and need [SPECIFIC INFO]. Find official docs and production examples for [Y] - API reference, configuration, recommended patterns, and pitfalls. Skip tutorials. I'll use this to [DECISION THIS INFORMS].", run_in_background=true)
// WHILE THEY RUN - use direct tools for immediate context
grep(pattern="relevant_pattern", path="src/")
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ deep_context = background_output(task_id=...)
**BEFORE implementation**, define what "done" means in concrete, binary terms:
1. Write acceptance criteria as pass/fail conditions (not "should work" specific observable outcomes)
1. Write acceptance criteria as pass/fail conditions (not "should work" - specific observable outcomes)
2. Record them in your TODO/Task items with a "QA: [how to verify]" field
3. Work toward those criteria, not just "finishing code"
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ A task is complete when:
2. lsp_diagnostics shows zero errors on modified files
3. Tests pass (or pre-existing failures documented)
4. Code matches existing codebase patterns
5. **Manual QA executed actual feature tested, output observed and reported**
5. **Manual QA executed - actual feature tested, output observed and reported**
**Deliver exactly what was asked. No more, no less.**