fix(marketing-plan): address review findings from codex + local audit
Resolves 12 issues found during comprehensive review: Spec compliance: - Trim description from 1025 to 963 chars (was over 1024 limit) - Drop non-standard top-level version field (VERSIONS.md tracks repo-wide) Cross-marketplace clarity: - Note that audit-marketing/positioning live in adjacent cf-skills repo - Document optional external skills in ops-stack-mapping (typefully, etc.) Idea cross-reference fixes: - Correct Activation count (7 -> 8) and Acquisition count (88 -> 116) - Rename "ideas" to "entries" for accurate row vs unique-idea distinction - Add "How to read this doc" legend explaining 139 unique / 144 entries - Remove #86 Lifetime Deals from Revenue (off-brand, kept in Skip note) - Replace machine-local ~/.claude paths with repo-relative references AARRR consistency: - Move signups from Acquisition to Activation per signup boundary rule - Add explicit signup-intent vs signup-completion distinction Resumption + state model: - Define progress.md schema (phase, current_section, plan_version, etc.) - Replace ambiguous resume condition with explicit decision tree - Protect finalized plans from silent overwrite (terminal state check) - Mandate sections/01..13.md as canonical persisted artifacts - Codify draft order (2..13 then 1, present 1..13) - Align file layout in SKILL.md with methodology.md Other: - Add ## 1. Executive summary header to example-olo.md (was missing) - Reconcile budget tier numbers ($5-15K canonical, was $5-10K elsewhere) - Soften verification check to allow documented external skills Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ Use this as the "what good looks like" reference when drafting a new plan. The s
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-05-27
|
||||
**Status:** Draft v1 — for team review
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Executive summary
|
||||
|
||||
Olo has built something rare: a clinically validated, brand-coherent, founder-led product in a category that doesn't yet have a name. The opportunity in the next twelve months is not to invent a marketing engine from scratch — it's to **convert the existing organic gravity into a measurable, repeatable funnel**, then layer paid acquisition on top of that funnel once the seed round closes.
|
||||
|
||||
**Three big bets, ranked by leverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user