fix: address codex review feedback on growth experiments
Soften win-rate language to context-aware guidance. Clarify weekly cadence to monitor guardrails while avoiding premature winner calls. Expand playbook template with sample size, CI, guardrails, segment deltas, and implementation status. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ Track your experimentation rate as a leading indicator of growth:
|
||||
| Metric | Target |
|
||||
|--------|--------|
|
||||
| Experiments launched per month | 4-8 for most teams |
|
||||
| Win rate | 20-30% is healthy (if higher, you're not being bold enough) |
|
||||
| Win rate | 20-30% is common for mature programs (sustained higher rates may indicate conservative hypotheses) |
|
||||
| Average test duration | 2-4 weeks |
|
||||
| Backlog depth | 20+ hypotheses queued |
|
||||
| Cumulative lift | Compound gains from all winners |
|
||||
@@ -292,17 +292,21 @@ When a test wins, don't just implement it — document the pattern:
|
||||
## [Experiment Name]
|
||||
**Date**: [date]
|
||||
**Hypothesis**: [the hypothesis]
|
||||
**Result**: [winner/loser] — [primary metric] improved by [X%] (p=[value])
|
||||
**Why it worked**: [analysis of why]
|
||||
**Sample size**: [n per variant]
|
||||
**Result**: [winner/loser/inconclusive] — [primary metric] changed by [X%] (95% CI: [range], p=[value])
|
||||
**Guardrails**: [any guardrail metrics and their outcomes]
|
||||
**Segment deltas**: [notable differences by device, segment, or cohort]
|
||||
**Why it worked/failed**: [analysis]
|
||||
**Pattern**: [the reusable insight — e.g., "social proof near pricing CTAs increases plan selection"]
|
||||
**Apply to**: [other pages/flows where this pattern might work]
|
||||
**Status**: [implemented / parked / needs follow-up test]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Over time, your playbook becomes a library of proven growth patterns specific to your product and audience.
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiment Cadence
|
||||
|
||||
**Weekly (30 min)**: Review running experiments for technical issues. Don't analyze results — just check they're collecting data correctly.
|
||||
**Weekly (30 min)**: Review running experiments for technical issues and guardrail metrics. Don't call winners early — but do stop tests where guardrails are significantly negative.
|
||||
|
||||
**Bi-weekly**: Conclude completed experiments. Analyze results, update playbook, launch next experiment from backlog.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user