ec31133ad9
A new skill (`/plan {client-name}`) that produces an exhaustive 13-section
Notion-paste-ready marketing plan structured by AARRR (Acquisition,
Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue), customized to the client's
current budget, team, stage, and tooling stack, mapped to future
funding-stage capability unlocks.
Three-phase workflow:
- INIT: research + structured 10-topic intake; pulls data from wired
MCPs (Ahrefs, GA4, Stripe, Customer.io, etc.); offers to run
/audit-marketing first
- REVIEW: section-by-section interactive draft with user confirmation
on each of the 13 sections; resumable across sessions
- FINALIZE: compile, verification pass (cross-references, machine paths,
brand voice), and optional publish to a shared GitHub repo
The 13 sections:
1. Executive summary
2. Strategic frame
3. Current state (scored against the 17-section audit-marketing rubric)
4. Acquisition
5. Activation
6. Retention
7. Referral
8. Revenue
9. 90-day roadmap (AARRR-tagged, owner-assigned)
10. 12-month outlook (with funding-stage milestones)
11. Marketing operations stack (skills + MCPs per AARRR stage)
12. Tactical idea bank (all 139 ideas from `marketing-ideas` mapped to
AARRR + client-specific status: Now / Q2 / Q3+ / Q4+ / Skip)
13. Measurement, RACI, open decisions, appendix
References:
- methodology.md — full three-phase workflow
- plan-template.md — 13-section template with per-section guidance
- aarrr-framework.md — AARRR primer + diagnostic rules for which stage
is the binding constraint
- current-state-rubric.md — 17-section audit-marketing rubric mapped
to AARRR
- ops-stack-mapping.md — all 26+ marketing skills + MCP/API integrations
mapped to AARRR stages
- idea-cross-reference.md — all 139 marketing-ideas mapped to AARRR
with timing defaults
- funding-stage-unlocks.md — 5 standard funding tiers (pre-seed through
Series B+) with budget profiles and capability unlocks
- measurement-framework.md — north-star patterns by business model,
leading indicators by AARRR stage, review cadence
- client-types.md — variations by client archetype (B2B SaaS, D2C
consumer app, hybrid hardware+software, marketplace, dev tool,
deep-tech/clinical, commerce)
- example-olo.md — canonical reference plan from a real fCMO engagement
Updates:
- plugin.json + marketplace.json bumped to 2.3.0
- marketplace description updated to 43 skills
- VERSIONS.md entry added
Total skills: 43.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
179 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
179 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# AARRR Framework — Primer for Plan Sequencing
|
||
|
||
AARRR (Dave McClure's "pirate metrics") is the spine of every plan produced by this skill. This doc is the primer + the decision rules for when each stage gets prioritized.
|
||
|
||
## The five stages
|
||
|
||
| Stage | Question | Common metrics |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| **A**cquisition | How do strangers become aware of us? | Visits, MQLs, signups, app installs, CAC by channel |
|
||
| **A**ctivation | Once they try us, do they have an experience that converts? | Time-to-value, % completing first key action, trial → paid rate |
|
||
| **R**etention | Do they stay and deepen? | DAU/WAU/MAU, week-1/4/12 retention, churn |
|
||
| **R**eferral | Do retained users bring more users? | Viral coefficient, NPS, ambassador attribution |
|
||
| **R**evenue | What do they pay, who pays, how does it compound? | ARPU, LTV, expansion revenue, ARR / MRR |
|
||
|
||
## Why AARRR for plan sequencing
|
||
|
||
Three reasons.
|
||
|
||
**1. Funnel-stage tagging forces prioritization.** Without AARRR, marketing plans become channel-organized ("here's the SEO plan, here's the social plan, here's the paid plan"). Channels can address multiple stages; tagging by stage instead asks the more useful question: *what stage of the funnel is the binding constraint right now?*
|
||
|
||
**2. Fix the leak before pouring water in.** The Activation/Retention question ("does the funnel convert at acceptable rates given exposure?") is usually higher leverage than the Acquisition question ("how do we get more exposure?"). AARRR sequencing surfaces this naturally.
|
||
|
||
**3. The Revenue / Referral conversation is honest.** Most marketing plans bury monetization under "growth" and treat referral as wishful thinking. AARRR forces explicit treatment of both.
|
||
|
||
## Brand and content — not a stage, cross-cutting
|
||
|
||
A common mistake: making "Brand" or "Content" the sixth bucket. They're not — they serve every stage.
|
||
|
||
- **Brand voice** governs every piece of copy across every stage
|
||
- **Content** feeds Acquisition (SEO, social), Activation (onboarding copy), Retention (email lifecycle), Referral (ambassador talking points), Revenue (pricing pages, sales material)
|
||
|
||
In the plan, brand/content shows up as the strategic frame (Section 2) and cross-cutting in Section 11's ops stack — never as its own AARRR section.
|
||
|
||
## Diagnosing the binding constraint — which AARRR stage is highest leverage?
|
||
|
||
For every client, one or two AARRR stages will be the binding constraint. The plan sequences moves there first.
|
||
|
||
**Decision rules:**
|
||
|
||
### If you don't have any users → start with Acquisition
|
||
- Pre-launch / day-0 / waitlist stage
|
||
- No funnel data exists
|
||
- Leverage = building the first 100 users
|
||
|
||
### If you have users but they bounce → start with Activation
|
||
- Signups happen but activation rate is low
|
||
- App Store conversion is poor
|
||
- Onboarding completion is broken
|
||
- Day 1 → paid rate is much lower than Day 30 → paid (means product converts given time but onboarding doesn't bridge to it)
|
||
- Leverage = bridging signup to first felt value
|
||
|
||
### If activation works but users churn → start with Retention
|
||
- Month 1 retention is below category norms
|
||
- Activated users stop using within 7–14 days
|
||
- LTV is short
|
||
- Leverage = lifecycle, deepening engagement, churn prevention
|
||
|
||
### If retention is strong but growth is slow → start with Referral / Revenue
|
||
- Retained users love the product but don't share
|
||
- Inbound referrals come in unstructured
|
||
- Pricing hasn't been pressure-tested
|
||
- ARPU is low for the value delivered
|
||
- Leverage = WOM mechanics + pricing optimization (these often cluster)
|
||
|
||
### If everything works at small scale → start with Acquisition (scaling)
|
||
- Funnel is healthy
|
||
- Question is just "more"
|
||
- This is the "post-fit" scaling problem
|
||
|
||
## Stage-by-stage strategic patterns
|
||
|
||
### Acquisition
|
||
|
||
**The diagnostic question:** Where is the gap between TAM-level awareness and current funnel volume? What channels are saturated by competitors vs. open?
|
||
|
||
**Common Acquisition moves:**
|
||
- SEO content strategy (organic compounding)
|
||
- Founder-led channels (LinkedIn, X, Substack for B2B; Instagram/TikTok for D2C)
|
||
- Paid acquisition (when budget unlocks)
|
||
- App Store / Play Store / marketplace listing optimization
|
||
- PR and credibility-anchor amplification
|
||
- Events (live, webinar, conference speaking)
|
||
- Partnerships (newsletter swaps, integration co-marketing, reseller / agency partners)
|
||
- Hardware / commerce surface (Shopify SEO + Amazon for hybrid businesses)
|
||
- B2B sales support (case studies, partner pages, vertical content)
|
||
|
||
**Sequencing principle:** Build the organic compound first (SEO + founder-led + content + PR amplification + ambassadors). Only layer paid on top of a working organic baseline. Premature paid amplifies what's broken.
|
||
|
||
### Activation
|
||
|
||
**The diagnostic question:** Where in the user's first session do they decide "this works for me" or "this doesn't"? What stops them from reaching that moment?
|
||
|
||
**Common Activation moves:**
|
||
- Bedrock fixes (broken gates, broken signup steps, broken paywall)
|
||
- Onboarding tests / rebuild (often the most leveraged single move)
|
||
- App Store listing rewrite (the threshold to the trial)
|
||
- Lifecycle Flow ship order (when to ship onboarding emails)
|
||
- Paywall structure + trial length
|
||
- Free → paid bridge (in-app upsells, soft paywalls)
|
||
|
||
**Sequencing principle:** Get to first felt value as fast as possible. Everything that adds friction between "user opens app" and "user has the experience that converts them" is a candidate to cut.
|
||
|
||
### Retention
|
||
|
||
**The diagnostic question:** Why do users churn? What would have made them stay? What's the "second moment of value" after the first one?
|
||
|
||
**Common Retention moves:**
|
||
- Lifecycle email flows: onboarding, lapsed user re-engagement, post-purchase, win-back
|
||
- Subscription / preference centers
|
||
- Churn reconciliation (often metric definitions don't match across surfaces)
|
||
- Hardware → software activation paths (for hybrid businesses)
|
||
- Annual plan defaults / pricing structure (cross-cuts Revenue)
|
||
- Support as marketing (high-touch moments that drive stories)
|
||
- Community + practitioner networks
|
||
|
||
**Sequencing principle:** Ship lifecycle flows in the order their content is most stable. Hardware post-purchase flows ship first (they don't reference in-app screens that might change). Onboarding emails ship last (they reference UI that might change). Win-back is a quarterly campaign, not a one-time flow.
|
||
|
||
### Referral
|
||
|
||
**The diagnostic question:** Is there inbound referral interest that isn't being captured? What's the share-after-value moment that's natural to the product?
|
||
|
||
**Common Referral moves:**
|
||
- Ambassador / affiliate program (start with inbound interest, not cold recruitment)
|
||
- Share-after-value moments built into the product (reflection prompts, milestone celebrations)
|
||
- Founder amplification (founder as referrer-zero)
|
||
- Long-game expert / Guides / certified-host networks (for category-creating businesses)
|
||
- Gifting flows (consumer / hardware)
|
||
- Two-sided referrals (reward both referrer and referred)
|
||
|
||
**Sequencing principle:** Lead with whoever is already raising their hand. If there are 5 inbound ambassadors, launch with those 5 — don't wait for a "complete program." Iterate based on what they tell you.
|
||
|
||
### Revenue
|
||
|
||
**The diagnostic question:** Is the company underpricing? Underpackaging? Missing an upsell? What's the "right" price discipline given LTV and brand voice?
|
||
|
||
**Common Revenue moves:**
|
||
- Pricing audit (what's actually charged today vs. listed?)
|
||
- Annual plan defaults
|
||
- Hardware → software bundling formalization
|
||
- Storefront / commerce page optimization
|
||
- B2B case studies + sales material
|
||
- Long-term value pool flags (data, expansion, enterprise) — flagged not executed
|
||
|
||
**Sequencing principle:** Run the pricing audit before testing changes. Surprisingly often, the "implied" pricing on the dashboard doesn't match the listed price — discounts, trials, or plan mix distorts the read. Surface the ground truth first.
|
||
|
||
## How to assign a move to a stage
|
||
|
||
Some moves clearly belong to one stage. Others span. The rule:
|
||
|
||
**Assign to the stage where the move's primary measurable impact lands.**
|
||
|
||
Examples:
|
||
- "Rewrite App Store listing in voice" — spans Acquisition (organic discovery) and Activation (threshold to trial). Primary impact = Activation (trial conversion rate). Assign to Activation, mention crossover.
|
||
- "Eye mask Shopify page rewrite" — spans Acquisition (organic search for sleep mask) and Revenue (sale conversion). Primary impact = Revenue (transaction). Assign to Revenue, mention crossover.
|
||
- "Markus's LinkedIn cadence" — Acquisition (top of funnel for D2C subscribers).
|
||
- "Customer.io Flow 6 (eye mask post-purchase)" — Retention (deepens hardware buyer engagement) with crossover to Activation (hardware → app premium activation path).
|
||
|
||
When in doubt: where would removing this move hurt the most? Assign there.
|
||
|
||
## When the AARRR breakdown isn't equal
|
||
|
||
For most clients, the plan won't have equal volume across stages. That's fine — and worth surfacing as a diagnostic.
|
||
|
||
- **Heavy Acquisition section** = client has product-market fit but top-of-funnel is the bottleneck. Common for early-stage with strong retention metrics.
|
||
- **Heavy Activation section** = client has traffic but conversion is broken. Often beta-stage products.
|
||
- **Heavy Retention section** = client has churn problem. Often mid-stage products that scaled past PMF without lifecycle infrastructure.
|
||
- **Heavy Referral section** = client has loyalty but no WOM mechanics. Often consumer products with passionate users.
|
||
- **Heavy Revenue section** = client is underpricing or missing monetization layers. Common for tools transitioning from free to paid.
|
||
|
||
If a plan ends up evenly distributed across all five stages, the diagnostic was probably weak — re-examine the funnel state intake to find where the binding constraint is.
|
||
|
||
## A note on the order of presentation
|
||
|
||
Always present AARRR in order (Acquisition → Activation → Retention → Referral → Revenue) regardless of priority order.
|
||
|
||
This is for the reader's mental model. Founders expect the funnel to flow top-to-bottom. If Retention is the most-leveraged stage but you lead with Retention, the reader has to context-switch.
|
||
|
||
To signal priority, use the executive summary (Section 1) — name the biggest bets there. The AARRR breakdown then walks the funnel in order, with the most leverage-positive section being the longest and most-detailed.
|